AI and Blockchain
AI Consensus as a New Layer in Web3
AI consensus is a process for agreement about a variable result. GenLayer uses Optimistic Democracy, independent validator assessment, and appeals. The result becomes final after the finality process.
Scope and decision boundary
AI output can vary between executions. A blockchain cannot treat this output like a fixed arithmetic result.
GenLayer separates proposal, validation, acceptance, appeal, and finality. This separation makes variable decisions compatible with shared contract state.
This guide defines the technical controls for this subject. It does not treat a model response as proof.
Start with the decision boundary. Identify the permitted inputs, the required output, and the state change that can follow validation.
This subject also connects to What Happens When Smart Contracts Can Reason? and Can AI Make Better Business Decisions Than Traditional Code?. Read those guides together when the decision crosses trust, retrieval, or execution boundaries.
What changes in practice
The network selects a leader for each transaction.
Treat this point as a design requirement. Record the input and the expected result before implementation.
A validator group assesses the leader result.
Connect this point to a visible contract state. A reviewer must be able to inspect the resulting behavior.
A disputed result can enter a larger appeal round.
Test this point with normal, invalid, unavailable, and disputed inputs. Do not test only the successful path.
Implementation in practice
Select a comparison method that matches the output type.
Document the owner, input, output, failure response, and test evidence for this control.
Explain when a result is accepted and when it is finalized.
Document the owner, input, output, failure response, and test evidence for this control.
Test disagreement and appeal conditions.
Document the owner, input, output, failure response, and test evidence for this control.
Verification procedure
Use this procedure before deployment. Keep the test evidence with the contract version and network configuration.
- 01State the decision in one sentence. Identify the person or system that uses the result.
- 02List each deterministic input, non-deterministic input, external source, and model dependency.
- 03Define the accepted output type, required fields, value limits, and failure states.
- 04Test correct input, malformed input, unavailable evidence, stale evidence, and conflicting evidence.
- 05Test validator agreement, validator disagreement, leader rotation, appeal, and finality where applicable.
- 06Confirm that no state change occurs before the contract obtains an acceptable result.
- 07Record the source, network, transaction state, and validation outcome for operational review.
Design review questions
A reviewer must answer these questions before the contract handles a high-impact decision.
- Can fixed code complete this task without AI or web access?
- What evidence is necessary, and which source is authoritative for that evidence?
- What result must a validator reject?
- What does the application do when the result is partial or unavailable?
- Can a user distinguish an accepted result from a finalized result?
- What data must remain private?
- Which dependency can cause several validators to fail at the same time?
Evidence record
Keep enough evidence to reproduce the application decision. Do not store private input in a public contract record.
- Field 1
- Contract version and network identifier
- Field 2
- Transaction identifier and current transaction state
- Field 3
- Source identifier, retrieval time, and content version when available
- Field 4
- Model task, required output structure, and validation criteria
- Field 5
- Validator outcome, disagreement state, and appeal state
- Field 6
- Final application action and the authority that approved it
Operational monitoring
Deployment is not the end of verification. Monitor the complete decision path and investigate changes in behavior.
- Measure source, model, and network availability as separate signals.
- Measure response time for retrieval, model execution, validation, acceptance, and finality.
- Record rejected proposals, validator disagreement, leader rotation, and failed retries.
- Track source format changes and model configuration changes that can alter output.
- Review appeals and overturned results for weak criteria or missing evidence.
- Repeat the validation suite after a contract, prompt, source, model, or network change.
Release criteria
Release the contract only when the team can explain each input, validation rule, state change, failure response, and authority boundary.
The test suite must include evidence failure and validator disagreement. A successful example does not prove safe behavior.
The interface must show the correct transaction state. It must not describe an accepted result as final before the finality process ends.
The operating team must have a response procedure for provider failure, source change, disputed results, and contract defects.
Limits
- Consensus measures agreement, not absolute truth.
- Poor criteria can produce consistent but unsuitable results.
Primary GenLayer sources
- Use the official How GenLayer Works page as the primary protocol reference for this subject.
- Compare the implementation with Optimistic Democracy before you select the final validation and failure rules.
Check the source pages again before production deployment. Protocol, network, and software requirements can change.
